Do Our Police Get Enough Training?
It is nearly impossible to become a great swimmer without getting into the water. You cannot become a great chef simply by reading cookbooks.
Read more free articles from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast.
Books and classrooms provide essential knowledge, but true competence develops when that knowledge is repeatedly applied under real-world conditions.
Police work is no different.
Critics frequently argue that police officers do not receive enough training. In some departments, that criticism may be justified. But the debate often overlooks an equally important question:
How much training are communities willing to fund?
Police Training Requires a Serious Investment
Consider the education required to become an attorney.
The traditional path generally includes four years of undergraduate education followed by three years of law school. After approximately seven years of education, aspiring attorneys must still pass a state bar examination before practicing law.
Even with that extensive education, no attorney knows every aspect of state and federal law. Most lawyers specialize because the law is simply too broad and complex for one person to master completely.
Police officers are also expected to understand and apply an enormous body of information, including:
Criminal and traffic laws
Constitutional requirements
Court decisions
Departmental policies
Investigative procedures
Emergency-response protocols
Firearms and defensive tactics
Report writing and evidence handling
Unlike attorneys working in an office or courtroom, officers may have only seconds to make a decision. They may be facing danger, confusion, resistance, emotional people, poor visibility, or incomplete information.
Despite those responsibilities, relatively few communities appear willing or able to finance a full year or more of basic training before police recruits begin working.
Read more free articles from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast.
What My Police Training Looked Like
In my department, recruits attended a six-month police academy. Most of those 40-hour weeks were devoted to classroom instruction.
The curriculum covered criminal law, constitutional requirements, departmental procedures, investigations, report writing, firearms, defensive tactics, emergency response, and many other subjects.
Practical exercises were included, but much of the academy experience involved studying situations we had not yet faced in real life.
Graduating from the police academy did not end the education.
We completed one week of in-service training every year. Approximately four of those five days, about 32 hours, were spent in a classroom.
We also attended daily roll calls lasting about 15 minutes. Some of that time was used to review changes in laws and policies, recent incidents, departmental procedures, and officer-safety information.
Then came field training and the first probationary year of police work. During that period, new officers received continual instruction from experienced officers, field-training personnel, and sergeants.
That field experience was essential because there are limits to what any police academy can reproduce.
The Classroom Cannot Recreate the Street
A classroom can explain the law governing a traffic stop. It cannot fully reproduce the uncertainty of approaching a vehicle at night without knowing who is inside, or what may be waiting.
An instructor can teach domestic-violence procedures. A controlled exercise cannot duplicate the emotions, frightened children, conflicting stories, hidden weapons, and unpredictable behavior officers may encounter inside a home.
Police recruits can practice making arrests, issuing verbal commands, and responding to threats. But even realistic scenarios cannot perfectly recreate exhaustion, fear, adrenaline, poor visibility, and the pressure of making an immediate decision.
Officers need both formal education and supervised field experience. One cannot completely replace the other.
Read more free articles from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast.
Like swimmers, chefs, and other professionals, officers develop proficiency through instruction, repetition, supervision, evaluation, and experience.
“More Police Training” Must Be Clearly Defined
Calls for more police training sound reasonable, but the phrase is often frustratingly vague.
What kind of additional training should officers receive?
Constitutional law?
De-escalation?
Firearms proficiency?
Defensive tactics?
Mental-health emergencies?
Domestic violence?
Emergency medicine?
Report writing?
Vehicle operations?
Cultural awareness?
Crisis intervention?
Communication skills?
Drug recognition?
Officer wellness and PTSD prevention?
Every one of these subjects has value. Each also requires time, qualified instructors, facilities, equipment, and money.
Additional training takes police officers away from patrol duties. In an understaffed agency, that can mean overtime costs, fewer available officers, and slower responses to emergency calls.
Smaller police departments and sheriff's offices may already struggle to maintain minimum staffing. Sending personnel to extended training can require replacement officers, travel expenses, specialized equipment, and additional facilities.
The issue, therefore, is not simply whether officers should receive more training.
The real question is whether communities will provide the money, staffing, and time required to deliver that training properly.
Police Training Must Be Continuous
Training should not end when an officer graduates from the academy.
Laws change. Court decisions redefine what officers can and cannot do. Criminal tactics evolve. Technology advances. Communities develop new expectations, and officers encounter situations that may not have existed when they entered the profession.
Continuous police training is necessary, but it must also be practical, current, and connected to the situations officers actually face.
Simply adding classroom hours may not be enough. Departments should also evaluate whether officers can apply what they learned while under pressure.
Scenario-based exercises, competent field training, meaningful supervision, and honest reviews of real incidents may provide greater value than another presentation filled with slides.
The quality and relevance of police training matter just as much as the number of hours.
Communities Must Decide What They Expect From Police
Americans expect police officers to understand complicated laws, communicate effectively, recognize mental-health crises, provide emergency medical assistance, safely control violent suspects, protect constitutional rights, write accurate reports, operate vehicles under extreme conditions, and make sound decisions in seconds.
Those are enormous expectations.
If communities want officers to receive substantially more training, that is a legitimate position. But the commitment must include the funding and staffing necessary to make it possible.
Better training requires more than criticism. It requires investment.
There will always be lessons that can only be learned in the field under the guidance of experienced and ethical officers and supervisors. Classroom instruction creates the foundation, but supervised experience turns knowledge into professional judgment.
Can Police Training Ever Be Enough?
Perhaps not, because the work, the law, technology, criminal tactics, and society's expectations never stop changing.
The more important question may be this:
How much training should our police officers, sheriff's deputies, state troopers, and federal agents receive, and how much are communities genuinely willing to invest to provide it?
What do you think? Should police officers receive more training? If so, what kind of training should receive the highest priority?
Read more free articles from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast.
Comments
Post a Comment